Mr. Speaker, if the gentleman from Ohio, who is my good friend and someone for whom I have the utmost respect, but if his theory has any substance, then the Mutual Defense Treaty with Taiwan which President Carter abrogated unilaterally must have undergone resurrection. It was improperly terminated then, and how many treaties over the years have been terminated without the involvement of the House that have now experienced Easter? Now, it is a matter of fact that the treaty itself provided a means for revocation and the Senate ratified the treaty in all of its verbiage in all the four corners of the document, and article 15, section 2, as ratified by the United States Senate pursuant to the Constitution, says, ``Each party shall in exercising its national sovereignty have the right to withdraw from this treaty,'' et cetera, et cetera. The President was required to give 6 months notice, he did give 6 months notice, and June 13 of this year equals the 6-month period where the revocation becomes final.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Mutual Defense Treaty with Taiwan during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Henry Hyde
this is a killer amendment. If you vote for it, you vote to kill this entire initiative, because this imposes limits on India's nuclear weapons program, but India already possesses nuclear weapons and is extremely unlikely to give them up…
I might note parenthetically that in the motion to recommit, it says ``to provide U.S. Armed Forces in Iraq in a timely manner with the equipment and other resources needed to do their job.'' I also take note that the supplemental 2 months…
I thank Mr. Ehlers. I appreciate your warm, gracious words. There is a story that goes around in my hometown, Chicago. It says, Bury me when I die in Chicago because I want to stay active in politics after I am gone. This is not the…
Members of this Committee know the story of how Congressman Henry Hyde changed his mind when the 1982 reauthorization of the Voting Rights Act was in play by virtue of the facts and the testimony that he saw.





