Why did the gentleman not add it, then, instead of substituting it, because many of us think ``in the public interest'' is a different standard and one could have a political conflict, a personal conflict, a financial conflict, but not find it in the public interest. There are two different standards.
The speaker is discussing the implications of differing standards in a legislative context.
Share
More from Henry Hyde
I believe it must be done fully beyond a doubt and without rancor or vengeance--complying with every woven thread of the Constitution.
an unrelenting Government assault on property rights, fueled by a dangerous and emotional vigilante mentality that sanctions shredding the U.S. Constitution into meaningless confetti.
Other voices in this conversation
