On the recordFebruary 10, 1994
The gentleman keeps characterizing it as the broadest possible, but really and truly, the public interest may well be different from a personal, financial, or political conflict.
Source
govinfo.govHenry Hyde: “The gentleman keeps characterizing it as the broadest possible, but really and truly, the public interest may well be…”
Editor's note · Context
Hyde discusses the distinction between public interest and personal conflicts.
Share
More from Henry Hyde
Jun 17, 2005
If I may reclaim my time, I want to say to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Gohmert), this is a marvelous amendment. The spirit in which it is offered is exemplary, and it is a very difficult thing to oppose it. But I see a problem with it…
Jun 14, 2006
The more valuable our dissent into weakness, dissension and inaction, the greater the aid and comfort we give to our enemies.
May 11, 2006
On May 11, 2006, I was absent for the following procedural votes. Had I been present, I would have voted: Rollcall No. 137, on motion to adjourn, ``nay''; Rollcall No. 138, on motion to adjourn, ``nay.'' ____________________
Jul 26, 2006
This is a killer amendment. If you vote for it, you vote to kill this entire initiative, because this imposes limits on India's nuclear weapons program, but India already possesses nuclear weapons and is extremely unlikely to give them up…
Other voices in this conversation
