Political Quotes

On the recordJanuary 25, 1995
during the debate Members argue, of course, that we do not need a constitutional amendment because Congress can be trusted to balance the budget without one. Well, that is what I thought 10 years ago, when I came to Congress. Since then, Congress has rejected countless attempts to balance the budget. Just last year the gentleman from New York [Mr. Solomon] and the gentleman from Michigan [Mr. Upton] and I brought a budget plan to the floor. We specified, for instance, something like $700 billion worth of cuts. It would balance the budget in 5 years. And actually, during that period of time, Federal spending would go up, about $8.2 trillion of spending over 5 years. We did not even touch Social Security. We thought it was a pretty good plan. It garnered 73 votes. Congress has failed to balance the budget for 25 years in a row. Who can look at this record and honestly say that they believe the budget will be balanced by trusting the will of Congress? Congress does not lack ideas of specificity on how to balance the budget, it lacks the political will to do so. Mr. Chairman, I would suggested that the Barton balanced budget amendment be passed.
Said by
Harris Fawell
Republican · Illinois

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the need for a constitutional amendment to balance the federal budget.

Share

More from Harris Fawell

Sep 12, 1995

Mr. Chairman, referring to the interpretive bulletin, which to my knowledge was the very first time that there was an official interpretation of the prudent man rule, they take sections 403 and 404 and they say: Here, we are going to…

govinfo.gov
May 13, 1997

I rise in support of the Impact Aid Technical Amendments to H.R. 914. I have long been a supporter of the Impact Aid Program, and I believe these amendments add necessary clarifications to ensure the integrity of the section 8002 funding…

govinfo.gov
Jul 24, 1998

Again, no, they are not. The legislation's more explicit internal and external review procedures under ERISA are not intended to expand or contract existing provisions of law. Therefore, it is not intended to have any impact on pending…

govinfo.gov
Sep 12, 1995

we do not want this construed to mean that there can be just generalized opinions. So I think it is something that ought to remain in the report language. And I repeat, I think if what the gentleman has is centered only upon housing, then…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation