Political Quotes

On the recordMay 13, 1997
I rise in support of the Impact Aid Technical Amendments to H.R. 914. I have long been a supporter of the Impact Aid Program, and I believe these amendments add necessary clarifications to ensure the integrity of the section 8002 funding disbursement. As we all know, States and localities provide approximately 94 percent of education funding in the United States. The largest source of this funding is local property taxes. When a school district loses 10 percent of its taxable property, the local schools are severely impacted. In 1950, Congress responded to this problem by creating the Impact Aid Program. The 1950 statute requires that the Federal Government reimburse each section 2 school district for each year in 'such amount as * * * is equal to the continuing Federal responsibility for the additional burden with respect to current expenditures placed on such school district by such acquisition of property.' The meaning of this language is very clear to me--the Department of Education should reimburse each section 2 school district by the amount which the Federal presence negatively impacts the school district. My district in Illinois is home to a number of school districts eligible for assistance under section 8002. These funds help guarantee that the quality education they provide to their students will not be adversely affected due to the loss of tax revenue on federally-owned property.
Said by
Harris Fawell
Republican · Illinois

Editor's note · Context

Supporting the Impact Aid Technical Amendments to H.R. 914 during a House floor debate.

Share

More from Harris Fawell

Sep 12, 1995

Mr. Chairman, referring to the interpretive bulletin, which to my knowledge was the very first time that there was an official interpretation of the prudent man rule, they take sections 403 and 404 and they say: Here, we are going to…

govinfo.gov
Mar 26, 1998

You have mentioned this 50 percent test several times. Who would determine what the level is of a applicant's motivation to work for the employer?

govinfo.gov
Feb 12, 1998

I simply want to take this occasion, along with my colleague from Illinois (Mr. Shimkus), to extend my best wishes to Lithuanian Americans all across this land. And most especially, I would extend those warm regards to the Lithuanian…

govinfo.gov
Jul 24, 1998

Again, no, they are not. The legislation's more explicit internal and external review procedures under ERISA are not intended to expand or contract existing provisions of law. Therefore, it is not intended to have any impact on pending…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation