Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to H.R. 2108. First of all, I want to say that all of us here today are committed to responsible stewardship of the Black Lung Benefits program and with its basic purpose as a worker's compensation program, something of which I think we lost sight of from time to time, designed to provide payments to disabled miners based on a clear showing of employment-related medical disability. Unfortunately, H.R. 2108 would move the program far beyond congressional intent concerning the Black Lung Benefits Act and, indeed, move us backward to the 1970's. Mr. Chairman, most of the people by now have forgotten that this $1.5 billion per year program was a last-minute addition, indeed an afterthought to the 1969 Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act, a law concerned primarily with the technical safety requirements of coal mines. So it was that Congress with minimal debate or consideration tacked a rider on to the Coal Mine Health and Safety Act and created the Black Lung Benefits Act, a workers' compensation act.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing H.R. 2108 regarding the Black Lung Benefits program during a House committee meeting.
Share
More from Harris Fawell
So under H.R. 3246, Mr. Chairman, even organizers are not prohibited from getting jobs.
The Supreme Court in Town & Country made it very clear that an employer, in dealing with an applicant, has to treat that applicant, even though the applicant is a member of a labor union and even though he may be a paid employee of a labor…
we do not want this construed to mean that there can be just generalized opinions. So I think it is something that ought to remain in the report language. And I repeat, I think if what the gentleman has is centered only upon housing, then…
the definition of ETI's, which is the first time to my knowledge that ETI's have ever been legally defined in any of the regulations or in the law, states: Are defined as investments selected for economic benefits they create, in addition…





