I would just state that the purpose of my amendment is to reduce the administrative expenses by the same percentage as the reduction in the subsidy appropriation; that is all we are doing, because we are asked to decrease the subsidy appropriation by 2.5 percent, and we are also being asked to increase the administrative expenses by 4.2 percent. So if we are spending less money, they should in essence be spending less money to administer this.
Discussing an amendment related to subsidy appropriations and administrative expenses.
Share
More from Donald Manzullo
Success cannot be built on wishful thinking about a regime that has shown a desire only to extract concessions from us and from South Korea.
We have been talking to, off and on, the tyrants in Tehran, and it isn't working, and it is not going to work.
The problem I still have with Dodd-Frank is at the time of the collapse, there were Federal regulations and laws in effect that if had been properly implemented, could have avoided the entire crash.
This legislation will honor President Reagan's leadership and foresight in protecting U.S. interests.
Other voices in this conversation
