This is what this is about. We are talking about the largest public works project in the world. If the Members who are in their offices watching this debate on this amendment want to be consistent on MFN, what they ought to do is vote for this amendment and continue to send a strong signal that we cannot have it both ways. This is the classic Clinton attempt to have it both ways. It is nonsense, and we should not stand by and let it happen. That will send a strong message. I encourage Members who care about American business and care about companies doing business abroad to do this.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the importance of voting on an amendment related to MFN during a debate.
Share
More from Donald Manzullo
I don't see the need to drag the insurance companies into this particular rule when in fact they did not present a systemic risk.
I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. McIntyre). Mr. McINTYRE. Madam Chairman, I rise to speak in favor of the amendment that Congressman Manzullo and I have introduced to improve H.R. 4078, the Red Tape Reduction and…
As the co-founder and co-chair of the House Manufacturing Caucus, I cannot overstate the importance of manufacturing in America and the need for this important legislation. The U.S. is still the largest manufacturer in the world, churning…
On rollcall No. 597, I inadvertantly voted ``no'' on Mr. McKinley's amendment. Had I voted correctly, I would have voted ``aye.''





