It is just physically impossible.
I would like to follow up on that, because we had a classic example where a member from your side forced a vote on a Saturday on a filibuste...
It promotes majority rules.
We are losing a lot of good people, and at the same time, we are finding agencies, critical agencies, that are left headless.
The human cost is there for judges, as well.
I hope with some of these, which I think are common sense things, do not detract from the Minority's ability.
Does not this reflect the new reality that maybe Senator Byrd did not have to live within his political experience, that now is the reality ...
I could not disagree more. Why should the minority, any minority, compromise?
I think we need fundamental change.
It provides for debate and deliberation.
he wonders what sort of rules changes he would want if he were in the minority