Nord Stream 2 is something that is very much not in the German interest nor it is in the European interest.
Adam Kinzinger
The Public Record
Adam Kinzinger is a former U.S. Representative for Illinois's 16th congressional district, serving from 2013 to 2023. A member of the Republican Party, Kinzinger gained national attention for his outspoken views on various political issues, particularly his criticism of former President Donald Trump. He was one of the few Republicans to support the impeachment of Trump and served on the House Select Committee investigating the January 6th Capitol riot.
I think there needs to be this two-pronged approach where the United States States clearly that this is not in the U.S. interest
Democracy is not just a result of replacing a corrupt leader at the top. It is embedded in the mundane processes, institutions, and rules and the daily actions by citizens and government officials alike to ensure the system works so the…
Ranking Member Kinzinger and I are introducing a resolution condemning these actions by the government of Belarus and recognizing the incredible bravery and efforts of the Belarusian citizens to move toward democracy and holding their…
I thank Mr. Gallego for yielding the time. Last year, this Congress came together to oppose Putin's attempts to weaponize Europe's energy resources. I stand here today to urge my colleagues to continue to stand firm against Russia's…
when we are talking about energy issues, can you talk also about the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, and how important are additional sanctions for that, to stop that?
We have to remain at the table. We need to be seated at the table, for sure.
The EU and NATO, they are not just allies; they are our most important allies.
The calls for the United States to retreat from our global obligations are dangerous.
In Afghanistan the difference between the Russians and us is the Afghan people want us there.
If this does not demonstrate that Putin's strategy failed, I do not know what does.
As Congress, we must come together and be the steel that forces Putin to think again.
I believe he was not. I believe that we can debate, and I think it is probably a good debate within the administration, of whether he should have been, because as the Secretary mentioned, it is a pretty serious accusation.
It is in our best interest to work with our allies, much like we did throughout the cold war.
Lenin once said: You probe with bayonets. If you find mush, you proceed. If you find steel, you withdraw.
I think we need to get to the bottom of it, and I think it is a very, very serious accusation that we should find out if true.
Since the 2008 invasion of Georgia, Russia has shown not only a willingness but an eagerness to develop, test, and deploy an advanced set of tools to undermine democracy and Western institutions around the world.
If the intelligence proved that the Russian officials approved of this bounty scheme, the United States and our international partners would need to respond forcefully.
The fact that we are even saying this underscores the point that we need to recalibrate our posture toward Russia.
I actually would have advocated for action, whatever that looks like, back in 2013 or 2014.
I think a lot of the so-called scandal that we have been seeing here is not a scandal at all.
Bounties on American troops is a despicable escalation by Russia that demands a response.
We need a Russian policy, one that keeps Americans safe, not one that puts President Trump on good terms with the corrupt and criminal government of Vladimir Putin.





