You authorized holding an impeachment hearing, but I don't think that is what you are really doing. If so, you wouldn't have disregarded precedent from the Nixon and Clinton eras, or we would have all voted before this was to proceed. If so, you wouldn't have denied the minority the ability to call witnesses or me and other Members the ability to attend hearings or even view the transcripts. Madam Speaker, approximately 90 percent of your party members wanted to impeach before this so-called inquiry ever began. That is why I say you are really not trying to hold an impeachment inquiry. You simply want to remove a President. And we are within 1 year of an election. You want to deny Americans the right to decide for themselves. At the heart of the matter and the real reason you are doing this is because your party does not have a winning Presidential candidate and no significant accomplishments this session. Madam Speaker, can we please go back to work? ____________________
On the recordOctober 22, 2019
Source
govinfo.govShare & report
More from Russ Fulcher
Feb 12, 2020
I just want to make a comment. We haven't been shy so far today over here on criticizing where we see issues. I just wanted to communicate with the gentleman that, in this case, I also want to point out the positive things. I support the…
Jul 12, 2023
Electric utility transformers provide a service that plays a pivotal role in the lives of Americans. Right now, there is a critical shortage of those transformers that enable America's electric grid. This shortage is keeping homes from…
Sep 13, 2023
This is a very bad situation, and it is up to us to try to do something about it.
Sep 13, 2023
Only in California can something like that be brought up, but, yes, that is my understanding. That is the direction they are going.





