I stand in opposition to H.R. 4447. A clean energy future is not possible without advanced nuclear energy. We are in a global competition. Russia is building seven reactors in Asia, has 22 more under contract in Asia and Europe, and proposals to put more in Africa. China is on pace to double nuclear capacity by 2030 and has stated it wants to build 6 to 8 reactors a year. In the U.S. we are currently building two. If we fall behind, so does our national security and geopolitical standing. That is why I introduced the Next Generation Nuclear Advancement Act, which was ruled out of order as an amendment. All sections of this act, the Nuclear Energy Strategic Plan, and Integrated Energy and Light Water Reactor Programs, have Senate counterparts with bipartisan support. These provisions need to be inserted for legislation to have a chance at becoming law; anything less is only useful as a social media post.
Share & report
More from Russ Fulcher
The United States of America has generated more prosperity than every other nation in history combined. That is because our divinely inspired system of government prioritizes individual rights through a republic that has representation…
You authorized holding an impeachment hearing, but I don't think that is what you are really doing. If so, you wouldn't have disregarded precedent from the Nixon and Clinton eras, or we would have all voted before this was to proceed. If…
Only in California can something like that be brought up, but, yes, that is my understanding. That is the direction they are going.
What is a just transition to so-called clean energy? We have been hearing the term all week from my colleagues across the aisle. Does a just transition mean the highest inflation in 40 years or record energy prices? Does it mean handing…





