Political Quotes

On the recordMarch 2, 1995
I understand the point. But we still have a difference of opinion on this in terms of whether it is viable, because we have agencies being required it do an analysis but no penalty, no requirement that they are to be reviewed. In fact, under the very amendment we are talking about, there is no judicial review to be sure the agency is conducting the analysis properly. All the agency has to do is conduct an analysis to avoid the problem of compensation. Mr. Chairman, the point I make here is that we have a basic difference in philosophical point of view. There are those who want to say the constitutional protection against a taking, a total taking of the property, is sufficient if we add to it a requirement that the agency study what they are doing, with no requirement that the agency must compensate or that the agency must be subject to review. The basic difference here is this: Our agencies today have shown, and I think here is where the philosophical difference lies, I believe our agencies have shown the American people that they do not give enough consideration to private property rights.
Said by
Mike Crapo
Republican · Idaho

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the need for judicial review and compensation in property rights legislation.

Share

More from Mike Crapo

Jun 6, 2026

“We have a moral responsibility to protect the most vulnerable among us,” said Crapo.

rounds.senate.gov
Jun 30, 2025

going back to endless subsidies is not sensible energy tax policy. Allowing adversarial nations and the industries that have been fairly industrialized to benefit from incentives intended to benefit Americans is doubly unfair. I urge my…

govinfo.gov
May 29, 2026

The federal government has a responsibility to counties home to federal lands in Idaho and across the country to help support essential public services like roads, emergency response and schools given these communities’ inability to…

risch.senate.gov

Other voices in this conversation