unfortunately, my colleague's amendment is not necessary. We have the maximum flexibility in this resolution to do the appropriate tax policy once we are able to get these instructions. I look forward to working with her to get the right kind of tax policy into the bill as we move forward in working on it. Because of that, this amendment is unnecessary, and I urge my colleagues to vote no. Vote on Amendment No. 1602 The PRESIDING OFFICER. The question is on adoption of the amendment. The amendment is not agreed to. The amendment (No. 1602) was rejected. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Oregon. Amendment No. 1989 to Amendment No. 1717
On the recordApril 4, 2025
Share
More from Mike Crapo
Dec 9, 2025
this week, we are going to spend a lot of time discussing problems with our healthcare system. To do that, we need to understand just how we got here. Concerns about the rising healthcare costs are not new. In 2009, Democrats highlighted…
May 29, 2026
Codifying the Department of Labor’s recent updates to the AEWR would help clarify and stabilize wages in the H-2A agricultural labor program.
Jun 6, 2026
“We have a moral responsibility to protect the most vulnerable among us,” said Crapo.
Nov 6, 2025
Senator Welch, first of all, I appreciate your acknowledging that we do want to work together. I would hope that you would acknowledge that we are working together to try to find solutions. This notion that the fact that we haven't had a…





