I am referring specifically to section 5 of the legislation that we are discussing, which is entitled exceptions, and it basically states there that compensation will not be made under this act with respect to an agency action, the primary purpose of which is to prevent and identify damage to specific property other than the property whose use is limited. The concern I want to clarify as much as we can here on the record is that this language is not intended to create an exception for compensation when wetlands are being considered by final agency action. My concern is that wetlands could be argued to be referring to specific property other than the property whose use is being limited and I would just, following up on our private conversations, like to make it a matter of record as to what this language is and is not intended to reach.
On the recordMarch 3, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Clarifying language in legislation regarding compensation related to wetlands.
Share
More from Mike Crapo
Jun 30, 2025
more of the politics of fear. Rural hospitals and providers not only deliver essential healthcare services in their communities but also strengthen local economies, employing hundreds of individuals and supporting regional business…
Jun 6, 2026
I thank residents, community leaders, local officials and industry professionals who took the time to share their perspectives and expertise.
Dec 11, 2025
we spent a lot of time this week talking about the problems of our healthcare system: Premiums are rising; hospitals are struggling; and out-of-pocket costs are out of control. These problems are not new. And, frankly, notwithstanding all…





