it seems to me that we can easily move to any of these other issues that the Senator and his colleagues have been discussing, which we all agree need to be addressed. We can easily move there if your side will agree to give up trying to stop the nomination of this one single judge. So one could say that those who want to hold the floor and focus on this nomination are willing to delay debate of other issues until we vote on this particular nomination, or that those who are filibustering--which is generally understood by the public as an act of stopping a procedure and moving to a vote--this particular nomination are unwilling to move to these other economic issues. Would you not agree that it really comes down to the question of whether we want to agree to change the precedent of the Senate and open up investigation into these confidential documents of the Solicitor General's Office?
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a judicial nomination and its impact on other legislative issues.
Share
More from Mike Crapo
Renewing the Legacy Restoration Fund will help ensure vital repair work continues in Idaho and across the nation.
This product reflects years of bipartisan efforts to translate stories of casework frustrations into tangible fixes designed to make the IRS work more efficiently for the American people.
Senator Welch, first of all, I appreciate your acknowledging that we do want to work together. I would hope that you would acknowledge that we are working together to try to find solutions. This notion that the fact that we haven't had a…
Idaho’s counties are responsible stewards of taxpayer dollars, and dependable PILT funding helps them meet community service demands.





