Political Quotes

On the recordJune 10, 1998
With this amendment we are debating today, which is a critical amendment, we will bring the last significant aspect of our Federal Tax Code that is of particular concern to Idahoans, and I think really all Americans, and that is the marriage tax penalty. I ask myself one fundamental question before I make up my mind on any issue we deal with on the floor of the U.S. Senate. That is, Does this policy make sense for the American people? Let's apply this question to our current Federal Tax Code which, quite simply, penalizes a working couple for getting married. Should folks pay more tax because they are married? Absolutely not. The marriage tax penalty raises revenue for the government--no question about that. It raises revenue. But it is bad public policy. It most often raises taxes on lower and middle-income families who claim the standard deduction. Now, that is wrong. We must strengthen the bonds of family to strengthen the fabric of our society. If we believe in family, we believe in marriage. So why in the world do we have a public policy on the books that somehow creates a penalty for being married? That is totally counterproductive to our values of this society, of this Nation. Before 1969, marriages were treated by the Federal Tax Code like partnerships, allowing husbands and wives to split their income evenly. In 1969, however, this practice of income splitting was ended, and thus was created the marriage tax penalty.
Said by
Dirk Kempthorne
Idaho

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the marriage tax penalty in relation to the Federal Tax Code.

Share

More from Dirk Kempthorne

Mar 3, 1998

Airbags are an important safety device, but they are designed to supplement the protection offered by safety belts. Safety belts are the primary safety device and should be worn by all vehicle occupants.

govinfo.gov
Oct 23, 1997

my children attend a high school in Fairfax County. It is a high school that has great diversity, great hope, great potential. It is a school that you might say is in some transition. The school has seen a great deal of improvement, has a…

govinfo.gov
Jul 23, 1998

I agree. They object to the scope of the proposed EFH program and are concerned that it will subject activities, including land development, agriculture, water supply, forestry, and mining, to the jurisdiction of the Fishery Management…

govinfo.gov
Nov 6, 1997

Mr. President, the bill also includes a very important provision to correct a mistake made over 50 years ago. Specifically, the bill authorizes retroactive payment of the stipends for Congressional Medal of Honor winners who only this year…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation