I agree. They object to the scope of the proposed EFH program and are concerned that it will subject activities, including land development, agriculture, water supply, forestry, and mining, to the jurisdiction of the Fishery Management Councils under the Magnuson- Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. Ideally, these guidelines, along with the comments submitted by nonfishing interests, will be thoroughly reviewed and, if necessary, republished by the NMFS. Congress should carefully watch this situation.
Dirk Kempthorne: “I agree. They object to the scope of the proposed EFH program and are concerned that it will subject activities…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns over the proposed Essential Fish Habitat program and its implications for various industries.
Share
More from Dirk Kempthorne
I recently created the Department of the Interior Task Force to study climate change, because of its possible effects on our ability to be good stewards of wildlife, national parks and other landscapes, as well as our responsibility to…
As envisioned by NMFS, essential fish habitat covers much of the coastal, marine, and estuarine waters of the United States, and it includes some inland habitat for anadromous species. The broad definition of ``essential fish habitat''…
Secretary Salazar has challenged the services and bureaus of the Department that are getting dollars to have their projects also reflect an emphasis on renewable energy.
Senator, yes, because we must have greater transparency; we must have greater communication.





