I agree. They object to the scope of the proposed EFH program and are concerned that it will subject activities, including land development, agriculture, water supply, forestry, and mining, to the jurisdiction of the Fishery Management Councils under the Magnuson- Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. Ideally, these guidelines, along with the comments submitted by nonfishing interests, will be thoroughly reviewed and, if necessary, republished by the NMFS. Congress should carefully watch this situation.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns over the proposed Essential Fish Habitat program and its implications for various industries.
Share
More from Dirk Kempthorne
in the defense bill we have language dealing with land withdrawal. This is a project that the Air Force has been working on for some years. The language that I have now proposed to the Senate is the perfecting language which has been…
the American Heritage Rivers Initiative [AHRI] was first announced by President Clinton in his State of the Union address to provide federal support to communities undertaking river restoration projects through improved access to federal…
Simply put, we are in a state of emergency. Whether it be low commodity prices, lack of export markets or too many government restrictions, farmers are facing catastrophes from every angle. If we are truly going to take steps to fix this…
As envisioned by NMFS, essential fish habitat covers much of the coastal, marine, and estuarine waters of the United States, and it includes some inland habitat for anadromous species. The broad definition of ``essential fish habitat''…





