again, in looking to the Budget Act and what may be some precedent that we could point to, if in fact CBO were to determine and so state that regardless of how much time they had they simply could not come up with an estimate, the Parliamentarian, as I understand it, may use that as a basis to recommend that no point of order would lie because there would not be basis. However, it is not to suggest that that would exclude other elements that the Parliamentarian might consider in still coming to the conclusion that a point of order could still lie.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Budget Act and CBO estimates during a floor debate.
Share
More from Dirk Kempthorne
As my distinguished colleague points out, the original provision was limited, focusing on increased efficiency and, wherever appropriate, information coordination. Congress did not intend to authorize a provision that created a sweeping…
Airbags are an important safety device, but they are designed to supplement the protection offered by safety belts. Safety belts are the primary safety device and should be worn by all vehicle occupants.
I stand today as the sponsor of Senate Resolution 201 designating May 15, 1998, as National Peace Officers Memorial Day. This is the fifth year in a row that I have sponsored this resolution and I am proud to be joined this year by 62 of…
I agree with the Chairman. Of course, we understand that funding for this project cannot be guaranteed, given the many competing priorities faced by the Indian Health Service.





