This morning I received a personal phone call from the Secretary of Defense, William Perry, who thanked me as a member of the committee for all of the efforts that the committee put forth so that we could have this bill completed in conference, and the fact that it was here before the Senate. The Secretary indicated that he was so pleased with this authorization of the conference report, and he said that he was communicating to the President his strong desire that the President sign this bill because this is what the Pentagon wants, and this is what the administration wants. Is that the Senator's understanding as well? And, again, is there any reason in the world we should not move on this tonight and give the administration what they have asked for?
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the completion of a defense bill and the Secretary of Defense's support for its passage.
Share
More from Dirk Kempthorne
As envisioned by NMFS, essential fish habitat covers much of the coastal, marine, and estuarine waters of the United States, and it includes some inland habitat for anadromous species. The broad definition of ``essential fish habitat''…
Thank you for your letter of September 8, 1997. I want to assure you nothing has changed regarding my enthusiasm for the Enhanced Training in Idaho (ETI) initiative. The 366th Wing at Mountain Home Air Force Base is an important component…
The driving urgency of the program is to have shovel-ready projects that create jobs that can help alleviate the economic suffering.
in listening to the Senator from Washington, we hear not only an effective Senator speak but we also hear a mother speak. I know of the beautiful children she has. I commend all of the Senators who have spoken on this issue this morning…





