I will answer that I strongly believe that we should follow this prescribed course. In that case, where you say there was a cost to the city of Albuquerque, there was a cost to the cities across the country that had to put in these metal detectors. Did it exceed $50 million? I do not know. If it did not, then no point of order would lie against the bill. But, I say to my friend from New Mexico, nobody knows what the cost of those metal detectors was, and we certainly did not know before we voted for it.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the costs associated with metal detectors in cities during a legislative debate.
Share
More from Dirk Kempthorne
I want to begin my discussion of this very important issue by commending the people of Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic for their brave and determined transition to democracy and free market economies. The citizens of these three…
the current discussion on education in the United States has been widespread. Both sides of the debate, I believe, truly have the best interests of our Nation's young people at heart. It has been a good discussion, and I commend the…
I rise today to declare my concern over the dumping of barley into the American market by a European producer. I share the Idaho barley producers' outrage about the current unprecedented movement of heavily subsidized European Union feed…
As envisioned by NMFS, essential fish habitat covers much of the coastal, marine, and estuarine waters of the United States, and it includes some inland habitat for anadromous species. The broad definition of ``essential fish habitat''…





