I will answer that I strongly believe that we should follow this prescribed course. In that case, where you say there was a cost to the city of Albuquerque, there was a cost to the cities across the country that had to put in these metal detectors. Did it exceed $50 million? I do not know. If it did not, then no point of order would lie against the bill. But, I say to my friend from New Mexico, nobody knows what the cost of those metal detectors was, and we certainly did not know before we voted for it.
Dirk Kempthorne: “I will answer that I strongly believe that we should follow this prescribed course. In that case, where you say there…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the costs associated with metal detectors in cities during a legislative debate.
Share
More from Dirk Kempthorne
As envisioned by NMFS, essential fish habitat covers much of the coastal, marine, and estuarine waters of the United States, and it includes some inland habitat for anadromous species. The broad definition of ``essential fish habitat''…
As chairman of the Drinking Water Fisheries and Wildlife Subcommittee of the Environment and Public Works Committee, I am concerned that the National Marine Fisheries Service's guidelines on essential fish habitat have exceeded the scope…
I agree. They object to the scope of the proposed EFH program and are concerned that it will subject activities, including land development, agriculture, water supply, forestry, and mining, to the jurisdiction of the Fishery Management…





