Again, there is a point I would like to make, Mr. President. The Senator stated that this locks us in. There is nothing to preclude that in a subsequent year as we find that perhaps, now, based on actual cost, those costs have changed. It is no longer based on estimate but actual cost; that Congress can revisit that, because in keeping with the spirit of what the Senator from West Virginia has said, Congress speaks. We do not delegate. This might cause us to revisit the mandates a little more often than every 5, 10, 20 years, which is welcome news to our State and local partners.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the flexibility of Congress in revisiting mandates based on actual costs.
Share
More from Dirk Kempthorne
Thank you for your letter of September 8, 1997. I want to assure you nothing has changed regarding my enthusiasm for the Enhanced Training in Idaho (ETI) initiative. The 366th Wing at Mountain Home Air Force Base is an important component…
It is just for a question. Would the Senator from Montana agree with me that as we are provided the data, although the idea was that these projects were not necessary, were not needed, yet we find they are in the President's own budget for…
I rise today to discuss Idaho's Very High Performance Backbone Network system (vBNS). The State of Idaho is in a strategic position to increase its economic base by strengthening collaboration on research and development projects between…
I agree with the Chairman. Of course, we understand that funding for this project cannot be guaranteed, given the many competing priorities faced by the Indian Health Service.





