To the Senator I would say that a committee could determine that they wanted to do a 90-10 split on the cost. Now, because they do not provide 100 percent of the funding, yes, a point of order could be made against that authorizing bill. But they could come to the floor and say this legislation clearly spells out that we are going to provide 90 percent of the funds; 10 percent will be matched by the local communities. And you could then hold up a series of letters from mayors around the country saying we think this is good; we support this legislation. And I think you would have an excellent chance of getting a waiver of the majority of Senators to say we agree on this particular one. Go forward.
Dirk Kempthorne: “To the Senator I would say that a committee could determine that they wanted to do a 90-10 split on the cost. Now…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding splits for legislation and local community support.
Share
More from Dirk Kempthorne
I recently created the Department of the Interior Task Force to study climate change, because of its possible effects on our ability to be good stewards of wildlife, national parks and other landscapes, as well as our responsibility to…
The driving urgency of the program is to have shovel-ready projects that create jobs that can help alleviate the economic suffering.
As envisioned by NMFS, essential fish habitat covers much of the coastal, marine, and estuarine waters of the United States, and it includes some inland habitat for anadromous species. The broad definition of ``essential fish habitat''…
As chairman of the Drinking Water Fisheries and Wildlife Subcommittee of the Environment and Public Works Committee, I am concerned that the National Marine Fisheries Service's guidelines on essential fish habitat have exceeded the scope…





