to the Senator I would say that a committee could determine that they wanted to do a 90-10 split on the cost. Now, because they do not provide 100 percent of the funding, yes, a point of order could be made against that authorizing bill. But they could come to the floor and say this legislation clearly spells out that we are going to provide 90 percent of the funds; 10 percent will be matched by the local communities. And you could then hold up a series of letters from mayors around the country saying we think this is good; we support this legislation. And I think you would have an excellent chance of getting a waiver of the majority of Senators to say we agree on this particular one. Go forward.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding splits for legislation and local community support.
Share
More from Dirk Kempthorne
the chairman also knows the pending conference report authorizes $220 million for technology development work in fiscal year 1998. Within these authorized and appropriated funds, Assistant Secretary Alm has agreed to provide $22.5 million…
As my distinguished colleague points out, the original provision was limited, focusing on increased efficiency and, wherever appropriate, information coordination. Congress did not intend to authorize a provision that created a sweeping…
Airbags are an important safety device, but they are designed to supplement the protection offered by safety belts. Safety belts are the primary safety device and should be worn by all vehicle occupants.
Mr. President, I have been the chairman of the Military Personnel Subcommittee for the past two years, and in that time I have learned the subcommittee itself cuts a wide swath on all the issues that we deal with. This subcommittee…





