As envisioned by NMFS, essential fish habitat covers much of the coastal, marine, and estuarine waters of the United States, and it includes some inland habitat for anadromous species. The broad definition of ``essential fish habitat'' raised concerns that NMFS will apply the EFH virtually everywhere. In addition, serious concerns have been raised by nonfishing interests regarding their lack of participation in the development of these guidelines. Nonfishing interests were not heavily involved in the development of the guidelines. But when NMFS issued the proposal, a coalition of groups felt that their participation should have been solicited.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns over the definition and development of essential fish habitat guidelines by NMFS.
Share
More from Dirk Kempthorne
I rise today to declare my concern over the dumping of barley into the American market by a European producer. I share the Idaho barley producers' outrage about the current unprecedented movement of heavily subsidized European Union feed…
My commitment to you is that, if confirmed, I will work to see that the decisions of the Service are based on science, not politics.
I totally agree, 100 percent; men and women should not be housed together. I think that the Senator from Maine agrees with me. There is no argument here. But when we talk about separate housing, I don't know that necessarily has to mean…
With this amendment we are debating today, which is a critical amendment, we will bring the last significant aspect of our Federal Tax Code that is of particular concern to Idahoans, and I think really all Americans, and that is the…





