In that hypothetical where you say it is between $10 million and $60 million, that you take the midrange, the reason that I would be an advocate that you take the larger range is because S. 1 is based upon the presumption we are going to provide the funds to State and local government, and therefore in order to protect them, you would take the larger range. Otherwise, we have a real possibility that we are underfunding.
Discussing funding levels for state and local governments in relation to S. 1.
Share
More from Dirk Kempthorne
My commitment to you is that, if confirmed, I will work to see that the decisions of the Service are based on science, not politics.
my children attend a high school in Fairfax County. It is a high school that has great diversity, great hope, great potential. It is a school that you might say is in some transition. The school has seen a great deal of improvement, has a…
The driving urgency of the program is to have shovel-ready projects that create jobs that can help alleviate the economic suffering.
As envisioned by NMFS, essential fish habitat covers much of the coastal, marine, and estuarine waters of the United States, and it includes some inland habitat for anadromous species. The broad definition of ``essential fish habitat''…
Other voices in this conversation
