I agree with that but it is up to Members not CBO to certify by note that they cannot do it. So there is no point of order, there is no basis for the Chair. I think we may be caught in a bit of a technicality or semantics issue. I would be happy to sit down with the Senator and see if we cannot craft something here. Again, I am simply saying I do not want to see the Senate go with the same procedure as prescribed on the private sector because it will then allow the Senate to no longer deal with whether or not, as the Senator just said, we ought to come to the floor and seek a waiver. We would not be required to do that. I think we should when we are using the taxpayers' money in the million- and billion-dollar categories.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing Senate procedures regarding budgetary waivers and taxpayer money.
Share
More from Dirk Kempthorne
I rise today to declare my concern over the dumping of barley into the American market by a European producer. I share the Idaho barley producers' outrage about the current unprecedented movement of heavily subsidized European Union feed…
no longer is there any doubt that Congress must audit the Internal Revenue Service. The hearings that have recently been held in the Senate Finance Committee have brought out under the glare of public scrutiny what many taxpayers already…
the UI's proposal would give rural Idahoans, who must deal with the lowest physician to patient ratio in the nation, access to better health care. It would give my state's rural economy a boost with real-time access to its customers. It…
the current discussion on education in the United States has been widespread. Both sides of the debate, I believe, truly have the best interests of our Nation's young people at heart. It has been a good discussion, and I commend the…





