The burden of proof in this case would be upon the Senator raising the point of order. The originator of the amendment is not required to get the CBO estimate. I think that it would be good government for anyone bringing an amendment that potentially could exceed the $50 million threshold in the public sector and $200 million threshold in the private sector, again, through the budget process. I know that has been the normal practice.
Dirk Kempthorne: “The burden of proof in this case would be upon the Senator raising the point of order. The originator of the amendment…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the responsibilities related to budget amendments during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Dirk Kempthorne
My commitment to you is that, if confirmed, I will work to see that the decisions of the Service are based on science, not politics.
I agree. They object to the scope of the proposed EFH program and are concerned that it will subject activities, including land development, agriculture, water supply, forestry, and mining, to the jurisdiction of the Fishery Management…
Simply put, we are in a state of emergency. Whether it be low commodity prices, lack of export markets or too many government restrictions, farmers are facing catastrophes from every angle. If we are truly going to take steps to fix this…
As envisioned by NMFS, essential fish habitat covers much of the coastal, marine, and estuarine waters of the United States, and it includes some inland habitat for anadromous species. The broad definition of ``essential fish habitat''…





