I wanted to obviously stand here in support of the Balanced Budget Act and the provisions as far as the taxes. But one thing that is very, very important to the State of Iowa and all rural parts of this country is the reimbursement changes that are made in Medicare. In my congressional district, our reimbursement averages about $311 per person per month. In some of the urban parts of the country, it is $750 per person per month. In those areas, seniors have the option in their health care for eyeglasses, hearing aids, prescription drugs, even memberships at health clubs. We have none of that available. In this act we finally address the inequity between rural and urban parts of this country with the base now going to $367. It is extremely positive. I want to thank the committee and all the people who worked so very hard on this to address this real problem. Mr. Speaker, I am proud to support the Balanced Budget Act as it comes before this body for a vote. Although this bill includes some items that I support and others that I would have preferred to have been left out, we should all recognize the bill as a product of bipartisan compromise and achievement. I am especially proud of the work this House and the Senate have done to increase Medicare choices for seniors. Bring equity to seniors from rural areas, like northwest Iowa, has been a priority of mine since I've been in Congress.
Tom Latham: “I wanted to obviously stand here in support of the Balanced Budget Act and the provisions as far as the taxes. But one…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of Medicare reimbursement changes in rural areas during support for the Balanced Budget Act.
Share
More from Tom Latham
I thank the gentleman. As we move forward to conference, we will work with the gentleman to ensure that any project ready for full funding grant agreements will receive funds under our conference allocation.
I reserve a point of order on the gentleman's amendment. The Acting CHAIR. A point of order is reserved. The gentleman from Texas is recognized for 5 minutes. {time} 2130
The amendment is very well intended, but I make a point of order. Mr. Chairman, the amendment proposes to amend portions of the bill not yet read. The amendment may not be considered en bloc under clause 2(f) of rule XXI because the…
I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment…





