Tom Latham: “I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to…”

On the recordJune 10, 2014

I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment to a general appropriation bill shall not be in order if changing existing law.'' The amendment imposes additional duties. I ask for a ruling from the Chair. The Acting CHAIR. Does any other Member wish to be heard on the point of order?

Said by

Tom Latham

Iowa

Source

govinfo.gov

Jun 10, 2014

Share on X Share on Facebook Email this quote

More from Tom Latham

Jun 9, 2014

I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment…

govinfo.gov

Jun 9, 2014

I thank the gentleman from Arizona for yielding. Yes, we were aware of it. We have been advised by the DOT of the ramifications of this amendment in the revised form. That is why I rise in opposition. It is DOT's concerns we are raising.

govinfo.gov

Jun 10, 2014

I really appreciate the gentlewoman bringing this issue to our attention. I know the authorizing committee has looked into the issue of voice communications on flights and unanimously voted out a bill out of the committee addressing the…

govinfo.gov

Jun 10, 2014

govinfo.gov

View all Tom Latham quotes

Other voices in this conversation

Tom Latham: “I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in…”