Political Quotes

Tom Latham: What a difference a new Congress makes. We have seen in the last 4 years on the Appropriations Committee a lack of any…

On the recordFebruary 15, 2011
What a difference a new Congress makes. We have seen in the last 4 years on the Appropriations Committee a lack of any kind of transparent open process. This last year on the other side of the aisle when they were in control, they didn't even pass a budget, a blueprint for spending. And that is why this year, Mr. Speaker, we have a $1.65 trillion deficit. One year, $1.65 trillion. We can't continue. The President's budget that he brought up, which is not just dead on arrival, it is debt on arrival, what this says is that we are going to double the privately held national debt, another $7 trillion. This is not fiscal restraint. This is not sanity. I have four grandchildren, and the reason I am here is to make sure that they have a future. We cannot continue this outrageous spending that is going on in Washington. This thing has totally grown way beyond what is comprehensible by any normal person. That is why, Mr. Speaker, this is the first step to bring some fiscal sanity back to Washington, D.C.
Said by
Tom Latham
Iowa
Source
govinfo.gov
Feb 15, 2011

Editor's note · Context

The speaker addresses the need for fiscal restraint and critiques the previous Congress's budget practices.

Share

More from Tom Latham

Jun 9, 2014

I think we all know in section 8 there are reforms that are needed. This amendment does nothing to those reforms, and it should be to the authorizing Financial Services Committee to initiate the reform so that, in fact, we can change it…

govinfo.gov
Jun 9, 2014

I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment…

govinfo.gov
Jun 9, 2014

We would be more than happy to accept the amendment in the interest of time if we could move on.

govinfo.gov
Jun 9, 2014

I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation