Tom Latham: “I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to…”

On the recordJune 9, 2014

I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment to a general appropriation bill shall not be in order if changing existing law.'' The amendment imposes additional duties. I ask for a ruling from the Chair. The Acting CHAIR. Does any other Member wish to be heard on the point of order?

Said by

Tom Latham

Iowa

Source

govinfo.gov

Jun 9, 2014

Share on X Share on Facebook Email this quote

More from Tom Latham

Jun 9, 2014

The reason I objected is we weren't sure as to what the amendment was, and we would accept the amendment. Mr. DeFAZIO. We won't take much time if the gentleman just would allow me 1 or 2 minutes.

govinfo.gov

Jun 10, 2014

I have great appreciation for the gentleman's point. The report was very shocking as far as the transparency and how some of these grants have been given. I am in a position where I must insist on being consistent in opposing all…

govinfo.gov

Jun 10, 2014

I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment…

govinfo.gov

Jun 10, 2014

govinfo.gov

View all Tom Latham quotes

Other voices in this conversation

Tom Latham: “I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in…”