the message was to cut spending. I don't know if anybody else got that message, but I certainly did in my district.
Tom Latham: “the message was to cut spending. I don't know if anybody else got that message, but I certainly did in my district.”
Editor's note · Context
Latham asserts that the election results indicated a public demand for spending cuts.
Share
More from Tom Latham
The reason I objected is we weren't sure as to what the amendment was, and we would accept the amendment. Mr. DeFAZIO. We won't take much time if the gentleman just would allow me 1 or 2 minutes.
Reluctantly I must rise in opposition to the amendment. I share the gentleman's concern, and that is why we have included language in our committee report directing HUD to review instances of payments for housing that exceed 120 percent of…
I thank the chairman for the kind words. I rise today in strong support of this omnibus appropriations bill. I am particularly proud of the Transportation-Housing and Urban Development division which makes critical investments in our…
I am in opposition to the gentleman's amendment. As you know, one of the very important functions of this committee is oversight--ensuring agencies under our purview are effectively and efficiently managed. The bill provides the Amtrak OIG…





