Political Quotes

Tom Latham: I spoke the other evening on this subject, and there is a lot been made about the WIC program and caring for women…

On the recordJuly 24, 1997
I spoke the other evening on this subject, and there is a lot been made about the WIC program and caring for women, infants and children. There is plenty of money already in the bill for that, more than what is needed as far as the carryover. But I think one thing that is being very much forgotten here is the women, infants and children of farm families that they are going to destroy by taking away an opportunity for them to protect the risks that they have out there. Mr. Chairman, when we look at the hope and dream of a small family farm which is made up, by the way, of women, infants and children, they would rather have them apparently go on the welfare rolls than they would to survive in their businesses. All we are asking for is the opportunity for these people, these small farm families, to protect their risk so that they do not have to get on a Government program, so that we do not have to have disaster bills which cost us billions of dollars every year. If my colleagues want to think about women, infants and children, why do they not think about those on family farms?
Said by
Tom Latham
Iowa

Editor's note · Context

Addressing the impact of legislation on women, infants, and children in farm families.

Share

More from Tom Latham

Jun 9, 2014

I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment…

govinfo.gov
Jun 9, 2014

The gentleman makes a very compelling argument, and we would accept the amendment.

govinfo.gov
Jun 9, 2014

The amendment is very well intended, but I make a point of order. Mr. Chairman, the amendment proposes to amend portions of the bill not yet read. The amendment may not be considered en bloc under clause 2(f) of rule XXI because the…

govinfo.gov
Jun 9, 2014

All this would do is limit the employees of HUD, and it would do nothing to the PHA employees. PHA employees are not HUD employees; and all you are doing is limiting funding to HUD employees, so it would have no effect as far as the PHAs…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation