I would point out that our tort system consumes up to 3 percent of our gross domestic product. If we need 3 rac{1}{2} growth just to sustain our economy, and our freedom, I might add, then our economy has to grow at 6 rac{1}{2} percent in order to make up for the 3 percent that is consumed in our tort system. It is a deep problem that we must address. It is a loophole in our current system that allows class action lawsuits involving plaintiffs from nearly every State to file suits in those few States that are known to be plaintiff-friendly and hostile to out-of-State defendants. These few State courts are making the decisions that set the policy for other States and the entire country. Out-of-State companies and residents are being sued in class action lawsuits in other States where their rights are being determined under those State laws. H.R. 1115 appropriately addresses this forum shopping problem by allowing Federal courts to hear class action lawsuits involving plaintiffs or defendants from multiple States or foreign countries. The biggest winners in the current class action scheme are trial lawyers, not consumers.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of the tort system and class action lawsuits on the economy.
Share
More from Steve King
I appreciate the gentleman from Texas yielding to me. I rise in opposition to this rule. And I have a whole stack of things that I will raise, but in the time that is available, I will say this: We watched as the Medicaid program was…
I was unable to vote on December 3, and 4, 2020, due to not being in town. Had I been present, I would have voted as follows: ``no'' on rollcall No. 230; ``no'' on rollcall No. 231; ``no'' on rollcall No. 232; ``no'' on rollcall No. 233…
I appreciate the gentleman's remarks again, and I would just point out that, of this list of disasters that we have and the delays we have in declaring these disasters, there is one here on April 29. A disaster declaration was declared for…
I was unable to vote on June 30, 2020, due to not being in D.C. Had I been present, I would have voted as follows: NO on Roll Call No. 130; NO on Rll Call No. 131; NO on Roll Call No. 132; and NO on Roll Call No. 133. Cardenas (Gomez)…





