On the recordAugust 1, 2012
I think we would agree in this Constitution Subcommittee that it is a bit redundant to even have this language in here.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
King suggests that certain constitutional language in the bill may be unnecessary.
Share
More from Steve King
Jan 29, 2020
This amendment, in reading through the bill, brings something forward that we have experienced a number of times in the natural disasters that have poured forth and the flooding in my district over the 17 years-plus that I have represented…
Jan 15, 2020
It is my privilege and honor to address you here on the floor of the House of Representatives. And given that we have had some serious discussion here this evening, I really appreciate my colleagues, Chris Smith and others, who have spent…
Jun 30, 2020
I was unable to vote on June 30, 2020, due to not being in D.C. Had I been present, I would have voted as follows: NO on Roll Call No. 130; NO on Rll Call No. 131; NO on Roll Call No. 132; and NO on Roll Call No. 133. Cardenas (Gomez)…
Jan 14, 2020
I thank the gentleman from Texas for yielding. I rise in opposition to this rule and primarily in opposition to H.R. 1230, that is one of the subjects of this combined rule that we have. The legislation that is coming before, the…
Other voices in this conversation
