This move will save taxpayers some $105 million next year.
Editor's note · Context
Steve King explains the financial implications of the House's decision to ban funding for erectile dysfunction treatments.
Share
More from Steve King
I regret that we have partisanship that's gone beyond our water's edge. It is a fact and fixture of this country's national makeup today.
94 percent of the workers in this country that are working under a union contract today, never had the opportunity to vote whether they wanted that union to represent them.
The combination of supply, consumer demand, pandemic disruptions and geopolitical unrest is reason enough for the inflation.
I was unable to vote on June 30, 2020, due to not being in D.C. Had I been present, I would have voted as follows: NO on Roll Call No. 130; NO on Rll Call No. 131; NO on Roll Call No. 132; and NO on Roll Call No. 133. Cardenas (Gomez)…





