I support the Smith-Oberstar-Hyde amendment which removes the Crowley amendment. The Crowley amendment to H.R. 1950 renders impotent previous language known as the Kemp-Kasten anti-coercion provision, a long-standing provision that allows the President to withhold funding from organizations and programs that were supporters or participants in the management of a program of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization. The Crowley amendment replaces this easy-to-use oversight language with language that would make it virtually impossible to pull the plug on funding to questionable organizations, by requiring they 'knowingly and intentionally' support the coercive program being carried out. Should not the fact that an organization merely subsidizes the effort of coercive abortions or forced sterilization be enough of a connection to make their hands too dirty to be trusted with taxpayer money? The knowingly and intentionally standard is difficult and perhaps impossible to prove. It would allow offenders to invade the prohibition and receive United States tax dollars to subsidize forced abortions and sterilizations.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Crowley amendment on funding for organizations involved in coercive abortion practices.
Share
More from Steve King
I appreciate being recognized here on the floor of the United States House of Representatives, and throughout the years I have had the privilege to serve Iowans and Americans here. This is a great deliberative body, although sometimes we…
You cannot rebuild your civilization with somebody else`s babies. You have got to keep your birth rate up, and that you need to teach your children your values. And, in doing so, then you can grow your population and you can strengthen…
It is my privilege to be recognized here on the floor of the House of Representatives, and to be recognized for 30 minutes here as the week closes out and we head back to our districts for Thanksgiving. The scenario that has been playing…





