And I thank the gentleman. But for a point of clarity, we are here. We are amending current law because we essentially have a promise we can't keep without amending current law. And that fits within a definition of amnesty, to amend current law, because if we enforce current law, there will be some people that will be penalized by that. And I don't take so much issue on this as I do the law.
Discussing the implications of amending current immigration law.
Share
More from Steve King
I was unable to vote on June 26, 2020, due to not being in D.C. Had I been present, I would have voted as follows: ``no'' on rollcall No. 120; ``yes'' on rollcall No. 121; and ``no'' on rollcall 122. MEMBERS RECORDED PURSUANT TO HOUSE…
I appreciate the gentleman's remarks with regard to this amendment. I would point out that we have 435 Members in this United States Congress, and it was envisioned by our Founding Fathers that we would get ideas from every one of those…
I thank the gentleman from Texas for yielding. I rise in opposition to this rule and primarily in opposition to H.R. 1230, that is one of the subjects of this combined rule that we have. The legislation that is coming before, the…
Employees want flexibility. They want the right to choose. They do not want to be forced into any particular situation.
Other voices in this conversation
