moving forward in my last minute in conclusion, I just want to emphasize that ICE is out there in the field and they are dealing with employers on a daily basis face-to-face. USCIS is a stationary operation and they operate out of their offices wherever they might be located with the databases they have and the access that they have to the information. But USCIS wouldn't be in a position to come out and promote Basic Pilot on a face-to-face basis with employers. I would say the only entity out there that has better capability of interacting with employers, other than ICE, would be the IRS. It may be a good idea for us at some point to take up the idea of eliminating the tax deductibility of wages and benefits paid to illegals and let the IRS help with this enforcement. But what this amendment does is it encourages and directs that ICE go out and interact with the employers and promote with $5 million the utilization of the Basic Pilot Program. Mr. Chairman, I urge the adoption of the amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the role of ICE and USCIS in employer interactions regarding immigration enforcement.
Share
More from Steve King
I was unable to vote on January 30, 2020, because of the need to travel back to Iowa. Had I been present, I would have voted as follows: ``no'' on rollcall No. 33; ``no'' on rollcall No. 34. Personal Explanation
I was unable to vote on December 2, 2020 and December 3, 2020 due to not being in town. Had I been present, I would have voted as follows: ``no'' on rollcall no. 228; ``no'' on rollcall no. 229; ``no'' on rollcall no. 230; and ``no''; and…
I was unable to vote on August 22, 2020 due to not being in DC. Had I been present, I would have voted as follows: ``no'' on rollcall No. 179; ``no'' on rollcall No. 180; ``yes'' on rollcall No. 181; and ``no'' on rollcall No. 182. MEMBERS…
I will conclude my remarks, and I yield back the balance of my time. ____________________





