Well, am I just imagining a happier world that a Supreme Court would have looked at the plain language in the Affordable Care Act and realized it was missing three words-- 'or Federal Government'--and wrote a decision that it doesn't include the--it doesn't lawfully allow the Federal Government to establish an exchange, and then simply send it back to Congress for the discretion of Congress to decide whether or not to act?
King questions the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Affordable Care Act's language.
Share & report
More from Steve King
Madam Speaker, I appreciate the gentleman from Texas yielding to me. I rise in opposition to this rule. And I have a whole stack of things that I will raise, but in the time that is available, I will say this: We watched as the Medicaid…
Mr. Speaker, it is my honor to be recognized and address you here on the floor of the United States House of Representatives. I come before you this morning to remind this House and to speak about the procedure that is pending in the…
Mr. Speaker, it is my privilege and an honor to be recognized to address you here on the floor of the House of Representatives. I come here to the floor to address the circumstances that are historic in the way they are shaking the very…
Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the privilege to be recognized to address you here on the floor of the United States House of Representatives. And I come to this floor to talk a little bit today about what is happening to our Nation, our…
Other voices in this conversation
