Political Quotes

On the recordJune 1, 2011
I would point out that I reference specifically the ``authorized by law'' program, and that's section 102 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. According to the leg counsel, section 102 governs everything related to the border fence. So I took care to draft this amendment to directly address the objection that was raised by the gentleman from Alabama, whom I greatly respect. This reinforced fencing act, again, goes directly to section 102. It's an authorized section. It's governing. It's governing in the code, and that's from leg counsel. So, Mr. Chairman, I would conclude my argument by saying this is drafted specifically to address the objection I've just heard, and I am hopeful that I will receive a positive result from the Chair. The Acting CHAIR. Does any other Member wish to be heard on the point of order? If not, the Chair is prepared to rule. The amendment proposes to earmark certain funds in the bill. Under clause 2(a) of rule XXI, such an earmarking must be specifically authorized by law. The burden of establishing the authorization in law rests with the proponent of the amendment. Finding that this burden has not been carried, the point of order is sustained. The amendment is not in order. Amendment Offered by Mr. King of Iowa
Said by
Steve King
Republican · Iowa
Source
govinfo.gov
Jun 1, 2011

Share

More from Steve King

Dec 21, 2020

I was unable to vote on December 20, 2020 and December 21, 2020 due to not being in DC. Had I been present, I would have voted as follows: ``no'' on rollcall No. 248; ``no'' on rollcall No. 249; ``no'' on rollcall No. 250; and ``no'' on…

govinfo.gov
Dec 12, 2023

94 percent of the workers in this country that are working under a union contract today, never had the opportunity to vote whether they wanted that union to represent them.

congress.gov
Jan 10, 2020

It is my honor to be recognized to address you here on the floor of the United States House of Representatives. I come to the floor today, Mr. Speaker, because this is the 1-year anniversary of the date that a disparaging misquote in The…

govinfo.gov
Dec 3, 2020

I was unable to vote on December 2, 2020 and December 3, 2020 due to not being in town. Had I been present, I would have voted as follows: ``no'' on rollcall no. 228; ``no'' on rollcall no. 229; ``no'' on rollcall no. 230; and ``no''; and…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation