I think that the paper that they have written and the position that they have taken certainly protects their financial interests. But it doesn't provide justice here for the taxpayers, and I would ask the taxpayers what they think. And I'm convinced that they are with me on this issue.
Steve King: “I think that the paper that they have written and the position that they have taken certainly protects their financial…”
Editor's note · Context
Steve King critiques the pharmaceutical industry's stance on erectile dysfunction drugs, asserting it prioritizes financial interests over taxpayer justice.
Share
More from Steve King
The combination of supply, consumer demand, pandemic disruptions and geopolitical unrest is reason enough for the inflation.
I am very concerned with the Biden Administration's regulatory agenda from bowing down to unions...
I was unable to vote on December 3, and 4, 2020, due to not being in town. Had I been present, I would have voted as follows: ``no'' on rollcall No. 230; ``no'' on rollcall No. 231; ``no'' on rollcall No. 232; ``no'' on rollcall No. 233…
94 percent of the workers in this country that are working under a union contract today, never had the opportunity to vote whether they wanted that union to represent them.





