Political Quotes

On the recordJune 3, 2015
I want to reiterate the positions that were taken by the gentleman from Texas. We have political subdivisions, primarily, as sanctuary cities that are violating Federal law, and all we are saying is follow the law. The point hasn't been made here that the Department of Justice could enforce this law, but they choose not to, and that empowers the political subdivisions, particularly the cities that continue to advance these sanctuary policies. Can you imagine being a police officer and being told that, if you pick up people who are unlawfully present in America, that you can't tell the INS--even if you are having coffee with them--that you have got a jail full of people who are unlawfully present in America that are required by law to be placed into removal proceedings? That is just illogical. I would point out that, if you disagree with this section of the code, you are here in this Congress, bring a bill to try to change it. In the meanwhile, I am for full funding of the SCAAP funding. I think that, when we have people in the country and we are not enforcing immigration law, we should make sure that local jails are funded when they are picking up people that are unlawfully present in America. I support the Byrne JAG grants. I want to give that to them, but we cannot do that under provisions if the local subdivisions are violating law.…
Said by
Steve King
Republican · Iowa
Source
govinfo.gov
Jun 3, 2015

Share

More from Steve King

Jun 26, 2020

I was unable to vote on June 26, 2020, due to not being in D.C. Had I been present, I would have voted as follows: ``no'' on rollcall No. 120; ``yes'' on rollcall No. 121; and ``no'' on rollcall 122. MEMBERS RECORDED PURSUANT TO HOUSE…

govinfo.gov
Jan 29, 2020

This amendment, in reading through the bill, brings something forward that we have experienced a number of times in the natural disasters that have poured forth and the flooding in my district over the 17 years-plus that I have represented…

govinfo.gov
Dec 3, 2020

I was unable to vote on December 2, 2020 and December 3, 2020 due to not being in town. Had I been present, I would have voted as follows: ``no'' on rollcall no. 228; ``no'' on rollcall no. 229; ``no'' on rollcall no. 230; and ``no''; and…

govinfo.gov
Jun 30, 2020

I was unable to vote on June 30, 2020, due to not being in D.C. Had I been present, I would have voted as follows: NO on Roll Call No. 130; NO on Rll Call No. 131; NO on Roll Call No. 132; and NO on Roll Call No. 133. Cardenas (Gomez)…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation