Just in the last few months, Congressman, this board is proposing in its general counsel to consider changing over 100 years--maybe up to 130 years of precedent in addition to changing over 30 or 40 years of established procedure and protocol on how the board runs elections without any justification at least that I can determine or others can determine.
King discusses the NLRB's proposed changes to long-standing precedents.
Share & report
More from Steve King
Madam Speaker, I was unable to vote on July 1, 2020 due to not being in D.C. Had I been present, I would have voted yes on rollcall No. 134; yes on rollcall No. 135; no on rollcall No. 136; yes on rollcall No. 137; and no on rollcall No…
Mr. Speaker, I move that the House do now adjourn. The motion was agreed to; accordingly (at 1 o'clock and 28 minutes p.m.), under its previous order, the House adjourned until Monday, January 13, 2020, at noon for morning-hour debate…
Mr. Speaker, I was unable to vote on August 22, 2020 due to not being in DC. Had I been present, I would have voted as follows: ``no'' on rollcall No. 179; ``no'' on rollcall No. 180; ``yes'' on rollcall No. 181; and ``no'' on rollcall No…
Madam Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to call up H.R. 8265 to extend the Paycheck Protection Program to keep millions of employees on the payroll of America's small businesses and keep our businesses open and functioning. The SPEAKER pro…
Other voices in this conversation
