Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this bill. It is, I think, something that even though it's been vetted fairly well, on those that are paying attention it hasn't been vetted very well by this Congress. And, from my standpoint, I am one of the people that's actually read the consent decree from Pigford I. I brought a copy of it to the floor. It starts out with these words, ``40 acres and a mule.'' Now, we know what that started out to be in the aftermath of the Civil War, a promise from the Federal Government that there would be 40 acres for African Americans, newly freed slaves, provided by the Federal Government, by either federally owned land or southern land that had been confiscated by the Union, and there would be a rented mule to go along with that, or a loaned mule. That has been the promise of slavery reparations. Of course, it didn't come to pass. In a few cases it did, but not many. But in truth we have here the modern-day version of reparations that are going on. Pigford I allowed for those who had a legitimate claim of discrimination to file that claim. Many who didn't have legitimate claims also filed claims. What I am seeing, information that comes to me, boxes, stacks of data, and people have been deployed to administer the first $1.05 billion, and they say to me they are sick to their stomach, they are heartsick because of all the fraud that they see. And the level, 75 percent, it's a low number.…
Editor's note · Context
The speaker opposes a bill related to the Pigford I consent decree and discusses issues of fraud in claims.
Share
More from Steve King
94 percent of the workers in this country that are working under a union contract today, never had the opportunity to vote whether they wanted that union to represent them.
I was unable to vote on January 30, 2020, because of the need to travel back to Iowa. Had I been present, I would have voted as follows: ``no'' on rollcall No. 33; ``no'' on rollcall No. 34. Personal Explanation
I was unable to vote on August 22, 2020 due to not being in DC. Had I been present, I would have voted as follows: ``no'' on rollcall No. 179; ``no'' on rollcall No. 180; ``yes'' on rollcall No. 181; and ``no'' on rollcall No. 182. MEMBERS…
The combination of supply, consumer demand, pandemic disruptions and geopolitical unrest is reason enough for the inflation.





