On the recordFebruary 15, 2011
I think that expanded the commerce clause beyond the intentions of the Founding Fathers.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
King expresses his disagreement with the implications of Wickard v. Filburn on the commerce clause.
Share
More from Steve King
Jan 14, 2020
I thank the gentleman from Texas for yielding. I rise in opposition to this rule and primarily in opposition to H.R. 1230, that is one of the subjects of this combined rule that we have. The legislation that is coming before, the…
Dec 12, 2023
94 percent of the workers in this country that are working under a union contract today, never had the opportunity to vote whether they wanted that union to represent them.
Jun 26, 2020
I was unable to vote on June 26, 2020, due to not being in D.C. Had I been present, I would have voted as follows: ``no'' on rollcall No. 120; ``yes'' on rollcall No. 121; and ``no'' on rollcall 122. MEMBERS RECORDED PURSUANT TO HOUSE…
Mar 5, 2020
I appreciate the privilege to be recognized to address you here on the floor of the House of Representatives. Having listened to the gentleman ahead of me, Mr. Louie Gohmert and some of the discussion that he had, I would pick up with the…
Other voices in this conversation
