On the recordJuly 11, 2016
It sounds to me that we are relatively universal among the witnesses that restoring responsible earmarks would be a constitutional thing to do.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
King asserts consensus on the constitutional validity of restoring earmarks.
Share
More from Steve King
Dec 4, 2020
I was unable to vote on December 3, and 4, 2020, due to not being in town. Had I been present, I would have voted as follows: ``no'' on rollcall No. 230; ``no'' on rollcall No. 231; ``no'' on rollcall No. 232; ``no'' on rollcall No. 233…
Jan 15, 2020
It is my privilege and honor to address you here on the floor of the House of Representatives. And given that we have had some serious discussion here this evening, I really appreciate my colleagues, Chris Smith and others, who have spent…
Jan 30, 2020
I was unable to vote on January 30, 2020, because of the need to travel back to Iowa. Had I been present, I would have voted as follows: ``no'' on rollcall No. 33; ``no'' on rollcall No. 34. Personal Explanation
Jul 1, 2020
I was unable to vote on July 1, 2020 due to not being in D.C. Had I been present, I would have voted yes on rollcall No. 134; yes on rollcall No. 135; no on rollcall No. 136; yes on rollcall No. 137; and no on rollcall No. 138. MEMBERS…
Other voices in this conversation
