I know my colleague from Texas is an attorney, and I wonder, is this not a result of prior Federal law that we have this exemption, this exclusion?
Greg Ganske: “I know my colleague from Texas is an attorney, and I wonder, is this not a result of prior Federal law that we have this…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the implications of prior Federal law during a discussion.
Share
More from Greg Ganske
The underlying Ganske-Dingell bill does have access provisions that I think are bipartisan, for instance, 100 percent deductibility for the self-insured and other small business provisions to help increase access. There will be an…
shortly after the last election in November of last year, I traveled to Hanoi. I spent about a week there on a volunteer surgical mission. I found the people to be friendly and courteous. Make no mistake, though: the Communist government…
But there is nothing in the gentleman's amendment that would prevent the FDA from intercepting that shipment, that drug that she had ordered, and testing it, just like they would do if she had ordered it from a retailer in the United…
I commend my colleague from Indiana for his persistence on this amendment. We have had this debate a lot. Before I came to Congress in 1995, a few years before that, there was a huge debate on this, and the space station only stayed in…





