If I may jump in here, many would criticize our specific plans, either to balance the budget or to reform and preserve and protect Medicare. I am sure that there are some things in all of those areas that the gentleman and I might prefer to see changed in some respects, too. We cannot have legislation that is this big and agree with every single thing. But the overall thrust is responsibility. I would say this: I think the American public feels very strongly that there should be a sense of fairness. So if the opposition criticizes our plan to save Medicare in 5 years, and we all know, everyone agrees that the trust fund will be empty and there will be insufficient funds to pay the bills in 5 years. We all know that. This is a given.
Greg Ganske: “If I may jump in here, many would criticize our specific plans, either to balance the budget or to reform and preserve…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing plans to balance the budget and reform Medicare during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Greg Ganske
Continuing the gentleman's analogy, Mr. Speaker, what the gentleman is saying is that there is not anyone in this House who is going to propose that we cut off all imports of beef or vegetables or fruits that come into the United States…
Tuesday, September 11, is forever seared into our minds. We will never forget the images of planes flying into tall buildings and exploding, people choosing to jump off buildings rather than burn to death, buildings collapsing on rescuers…
let us get into the nitty-gritty of comparing some of the aspects of these bills. Mr. Chairman, I would make a strong argument that the Senate bill has stronger provisions in terms of requirements for screeners than the Young bill. The…
the events of yesterday, September 11, are forever seared into our minds as with branding irons. We grieve for the victims and their families. We pray for them. Let the word go forth to our enemies. We are united in our resolve to avenge…





