I oppose this amendment simply because it is not needed. First, I will comment on the possibility of the Vice President of the United States having to vote today to break a tie. I predict that if the Vice President is in town and this vote is that close, the Vice President will be here and will have an opportunity to cast that vote. If the Vice President is in town to break a tie, there is going to be at least one person who supports that amendment who is going to vote against it just so we can have a tie vote, just so the President can cast his vote because the Vice President running for President of the United States is not going to break into his schedule with the tight vote he had in New Hampshire last night and avoid campaigning in the other States and waste his time here if he does not actually have to cast that vote. We are in for not only political moments on this issue, but we are in for some very constitutional moments on this issue as well. I like the theater that is going on this morning.
Chuck Grassley: “I oppose this amendment simply because it is not needed. First, I will comment on the possibility of the Vice President…”
On the recordFebruary 2, 2000
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a potential tie vote in the Senate regarding an amendment.
Share
More from Chuck Grassley
Aug 10, 2026
A vote for Todd Blanche is a vote for the safety of the American people.
Jul 29, 2026
This commonsense legislation is a meaningful step toward strengthening protections for the taxpayer.
Aug 20, 2026
U.S debt hit $40T. It’s a wake up call [for] America Voters [to have] 40 trillion reasons [to] reject unaffordable socialist policies. American prosperity REQUIRES fiscal discipline.
Jun 19, 2026
The judicial branch has a massive impact on Americans’ daily lives, yet few of us get the chance to see the wheels of justice in motion. Allowing cameras in federal courtrooms would help foster civic engagement and increase confidence in…





